MY HUSBAND FIL.MED ME WHILE WE WERE H@VIN S.3.X, LE@KS VIDEO TO PUBLIC – WOMAN TELLS COURT
A 37 12 months previous girl, Folasade Olaniyan, on Monday informed an Idi-Ogungun Customary Courtroom, Agodi in Ibadan, Oyo that her husband, Ojo Olaniyan, film'ed her whereas mak'ing love with him.
Folashade informed the court docket that her husband additionally went forward and le'aked the video to his family and friends members.
The Information Company of Nigeria (NAN) experiences that Folasade approached the court doc?ket for dissolution of her 15-year-old union with Olaniyan over brutality and lack of belief.
She additionally informed the court docket that her husband didn’t look after the 4 children of the union, threa'tened her life and in addition smo'ked Indian-hemp.
In her testimony earlier than the court docket on Monday, the plaintiff narrated how Olaniyan continually accused her of getting additional marital affairs.
“I’m a meals vendor however he’s all the time suspicious of me and accuses me of sleeping with my clients.
“When he couldn’t set up proof on the allegation, he filmed my na'ked'ness whereas each of us have been having intercourse in our condominium.
“To my shock, he le'aked the images to neighbours and my dad and mom that he ca'ught me in a lodge with considered one of my clients.
She begged the court docket to dissolve the wedding to keep away from premature dying and free her from his brutality and unwarranted embarrassment.
Read: How my father se-duce-d me before making luv to me
The President of the court docket, Mr Mukaila Balogun, famous that the respondent was not in court docket regardless of the truth that he obtained court docket summon twice.
Balogun, subsequently, pronounced the dissolution of the wedding and granted custody of the 4 kids to the plaintiff.
The president additionally ordered the respondent to pay N12, 000 month-to-month for the maintenance of the 4 kids.
He mentioned that the respondent needs to be served a duplicate of the judgment and in addition restrained him from additional harassment of the plaintiff.
Comments
Post a Comment